Users should consult with a qualified healthcare provider for specific questions regarding therapies, diagnosis and/or health conditions, prior to making therapeutic decisions. Prior to this update, Bridgy could be used to like a Facebook post from one’s own website, without visiting Facebook directly. When Bridgy retrieves data from Facebook to one’s personal website, it publishes a publicly visible copy of that interaction on Bridgy’s website. These updates removed the ability for third-party apps to publish content to one’s Facebook account (Archibong, 2018), which meant that Bridgy could no longer syndicate from one’s website to Facebook. Generation 4: People using social networks who have never purchased a domain name or run a personal website. You can also use it to post to social networks – or comment, Order Rx24 like, reshare, or even RSVP – from your own web site” (Bridgy 2020). Like many IndieWeb tools, Bridgy is provided for free and is funded out of pocket by its creator. Furthermore, while cultural homogeneity in people’s personal networks poses a challenge for diverse outreach, participating with other communities was identified as a way to broaden one’s network and to understand the needs of others.
The first step to address this possibility to is consider whether women were subject to discriminatory behaviour or stereotype threat, the risk of being judged by negative stereotypes that undermine one’s performance or aspirations (Spencer, Logel, and P. G. Davies 2016). No evidence was observed to suggest this was the case. Another possibility is that behaviour or discourse has articulated gender biases. In general, these observations demonstrate a community that strives to treat everyone as equal, but which has inherited gender and other biases that are common to open source and other technical communities more generally. Facebook support has advised Bridgy’s developers, “Please treat IDs as unique strings, they are not meant to be broken down and used” (Facebook for Developers 2019b). However, it is only when broken down and used that these IDs can be translated in URLs. ’s still cheap enough for him to run and it’s also not something he has to handle too much active support on.
’re small enough you don’t care.” The development history of Bridgy indicates that Facebook and similar platforms are not actively attempting to prevent Bridgy’s style of syndication. First, that “anyone in the community” can step up to moderate conflict, and second that being active and visible in chat has been interpreted to indicate that one is a de facto leader, or at least versed enough in the community to navigate conflict. The major limitation of this analysis is that is unable to address questions about what conditions may contribute to people’s inclusion or exclusion from this centre (i.e. related to the second half of RQ3). This led to my analyses in Chapters 5 and 6, which described centres of influence and factors contributing to exclusion among IndieWeb’s community. The second section presents results concerning influence and exclusion oriented around technical experience, and the third section discusses exclusion related to identity (focusing on a gender gap), as well as strategies for addressing such barriers. In this chapter, I have addressed the second part of RQ3 by identifying factors contributing to exclusion in IndieWeb’s community. In Bridgy’s case, this largely extends to IndieWeb’s chat channels and wiki, with which I have been engaged throughout this dissertation.
In general, community members whose technical accomplishments were referenced as influential were also likely to be recognized as actively teaching others and answering technical questions posted to chat or at in-person events. For my research questions, which are largely about questions of values that are inherently nuanced, these representations are on their own insufficient. I will conclude this chapter by returning to the research questions posed at its beginning, and then discussing implications of the results for the IndieWeb and design research more generally. First, women have been less likely than men to participate in the IndieWeb in the first place, and women have also been more likely to leave events early. First, there has been an effort to increase diversity across all IndieWeb events. However, the collective effort of building IndieWeb’s infrastructure, and the fact that it is a collective accomplishment, contribute to greater levels of substance. Chapter 4 focused on an individual perspective of building for the IndieWeb. Instagram, Flickr, and GitHub, though its features for each platform vary according to constraints of individual APIs. Nonetheless, it demonstrates the employment of communal values to address a situation in which IndieWeb’s typical values of individual autonomy were insufficient.